<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a church cio &#187; Telecommunications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchcio.com/church-cio/telecommunications/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchcio.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IRC is the Ham Radio of the Internet</title>
		<link>http://churchcio.com/irc-is-the-ham-radio-of-the-internet</link>
		<comments>http://churchcio.com/irc-is-the-ham-radio-of-the-internet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research & Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchcio.com/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jumping into the Church IT IRC channel today, it occurred to me that IRC is the Ham Radio of the Internet. Here is why:

You have to be old to remember it&#8217;s good-old-days.
It doesn&#8217;t come with any training at all.
Has it&#8217;s own etiquette and cultural norms, which you only find out by doing the wrong thing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumping into the <a title="#CITRT" href="http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=citrt" target="_blank">Church IT IRC channel</a> today, it occurred to me that <a title="IRC" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC" target="_blank">IRC</a> is the <a title="Ham Radio" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amateur_radio" target="_blank">Ham Radio</a> of the Internet. Here is why:</p>
<ol>
<li>You have to be old to remember it&#8217;s good-old-days.</li>
<li>It doesn&#8217;t come with any training at all.</li>
<li>Has it&#8217;s own etiquette and cultural norms, which you only find out by doing the wrong thing publicly.</li>
<li>Signing off and on isn&#8217;t easy&#8230; the commands aren&#8217;t self-evident.</li>
<li>Finding your friends is hard.</li>
<li>It is used in emergencies when more traditional communications are down.</li>
<li>You fire a message and can&#8217;t forget&#8230; you have to wait for a response before moving on to other things (unlike Skype or Google Chat which will obnoxiously make noises at you).</li>
</ol>
<p>There has been a lot of noise recently about Twitter as communications platform for the future. I don&#8217;t mind the projectionists prognosticating about Twitter killing other mediums, but one thing that bothers me is that unlike Ham Radio and IRC, Twitter isn&#8217;t built on standard protocols or an open network.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, <a title="Jason's Twitter Account" href="http://twitter.com/jasonreynolds" target="_blank">my 2,050 Tweets </a>shows I am a real supporter of the thing, but I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m going to depend on Twitter during a government overthrow, during a hurricane on a satellite phone, or in the midst of a battle. Twitter just isn&#8217;t dependable or open enough yet, and if it were I would imagine our military would have jumped on it before we got to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://churchcio.com/irc-is-the-ham-radio-of-the-internet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
